Cornflakes and Breakfast Cereals: When Processing Destroys the Protein

A DIAAS of 1. That is how low a corn-based breakfast cereal scored in a study comparing 14 protein sources. The cause is a reaction that also creates browning and flavor.

Updated: October 7, 2026 · Based on 4 scientific sources

In short

In a rat study, a corn-based breakfast cereal scored a DIAAS of 1, the lowest value of 14 protein sources. Only 13 % of its lysine was usable. The authors blame the Maillard reaction during manufacturing. Not all cereals are affected equally, but processed grain products often lose a lot of lysine. With milk, the protein of the meal is still good, because milk supplies the missing lysine.

A DIAAS of 1

Rutherfurd et al. 2015 tested 14 protein sources in rats, in the form people eat them: milk and soy proteins, cooked peas, beans, rice and rolled oats, wheat bran, peanuts and a corn-based breakfast cereal from the supermarket. The study does not name a brand.

14 protein sources compared
Milk protein concentrate118
Whey isolate109
Whey concentrate97.3
Soy protein isolate90.6
Pea protein concentrate82.2
Rice, cooked59.5
Kidney beans, cooked58.8
Peas, cooked57.9
Rolled oats, cooked54.2
Peanuts, roasted43.4
Wheat bran41.1
Rice protein concentrate37.1
Corn-based breakfast cereallimited by lysine1.2

Line = 100, from here on fully usable. DIAAS, young child pattern (0.5–3 years), measured in rats. Of two soy protein isolates, the better one is shown (the other: 89.8). Data: Rutherfurd et al. 2015, Table 5.

Overall, 67 % of the cereal's protein was still digested. For lysine, though, it was only 13 %. Because lysine is scarce in corn to begin with, the DIAAS fell to 0.012, rounded to 1. The authors write that this shows how strongly processing can impair the protein quality of some foods.

What happens to the lysine

The authors consider Maillard reactions during manufacturing the most likely cause. In this reaction, sugars and amino acids bond under heat. It gives cereal flakes, bread crust and cookies their golden-brown color and roasted flavor. Lysine is especially prone to it. Moughan & Lim 2024 call it the amino acid most easily damaged during processing.

The tricky part is that standard lab analyses partly miss the damage. During analysis, the protein is broken down with strong acid. In the process, some early Maillard products turn back into lysine, which does not happen in the gut. An example from an FAO report (FAO sub-committee 2012) with a heated mixture of casein and sugar:

Measurement methodLysine g/100 g
Standard analysis with acid2.60
Unaltered ("reactive") lysine1.98
Of which actually absorbed1.40
Data: FAO sub-committee 2012, Table 5 (study in pigs).

That is why the FAO 2013 recommends measuring reactive lysine in processed foods. According to Moughan and Lim, though, this step has so far been largely overlooked.

How big are the losses in other products?

Moughan & Lim 2024 show how far usable lysine falls below the value from standard analysis:

Lysine loss from processing
Grain-based breakfast cereals58.3
Puffed rice57.1
Toasted wheat bread33.7
Processed wheat bran20.9
Whole-grain bread16.7
Skim milk powder16.2
Black beans, cooked14.4
Peas, heated7.4
Whey isolate0.1

Percentage by which usable (reactive) lysine falls below the value from standard analysis. Measured in pigs or rats. The bar shows a loss, not a DIAAS. Data: Moughan & Lim 2024, Table 2.

Grain-based breakfast cereals and puffed rice lost more than half of their lysine. However, the values vary a lot from product to product. In the FAO sub-committee's rat data, reactive lysine from flakes and puffed products was 53 to 100 % usable depending on the product, and 66 % from corn flakes. So the 13 % from the study by Rutherfurd et al. is an extreme value, not an average.

Why milk solves the problem

Rutherfurd et al. also calculated what happens when the cereal is mixed with milk protein, at a ratio of 60 : 40 based on protein. According to the authors, this roughly matches a bowl of cereal with milk. They used milk protein concentrate for the calculation. Result: a DIAAS of 1.07. Milk protein contains so much lysine that it fills the gap completely.

Calculated with the proteinscore database (adults):

BreakfastProteinDIAAS
40 g cornflakes, dry2.8 g1open
40 g cornflakes + 200 ml milk9.4 g117open
40 g cornflakes + 200 ml soy milk9.4 g76open
60 g rolled oats + 250 ml milk16.2 g116open
Calculated with the proteinscore database. For cornflakes we use the measured values from Rutherfurd et al. 2015. Sources under Data.

The protein in the meal then comes almost entirely from the milk. If you want more protein at breakfast, rolled oats are a better choice. They have more protein, and in the study 84 % of their lysine was available.

Limitations of the study

Frequently asked questions

Do cornflakes have protein?

A little, and hardly any of it is usable. One corn-based breakfast cereal that was tested scored a DIAAS of 1, because only 13 % of its lysine was available. Other cereals did better in other measurements.

What is the Maillard reaction?

A reaction between sugars and amino acids during heating that creates browning and roasted flavor. It mainly alters lysine, which the body can then no longer use.

Are cornflakes with milk okay?

For the protein, yes. Milk protein contains so much lysine that a mix like a typical bowl with milk works out to a DIAAS above 100. But then almost all the protein comes from the milk.

How does your meal score?

Go to the calculator

Sources

  1. Rutherfurd, S. M., Fanning, A. C., Miller, B. J. & Moughan, P. J. (2015): Protein digestibility-corrected amino acid scores and digestible indispensable amino acid scores differentially describe protein quality in growing male rats. Journal of Nutrition 145, 372–379. doi:10.3945/jn.114.195438
  2. Moughan, P. J. & Lim, W. X. J. (2024): Digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS): 10 years on. Frontiers in Nutrition 11, 1389719. doi:10.3389/fnut.2024.1389719
  3. Moughan, P. J., Gilani, S., Rutherfurd, S. M. & Tomé, D. (2012): Report of a Sub-Committee of the 2011 FAO Consultation on “Protein Quality Evaluation in Human Nutrition”, with appendix by Moughan & Rutherfurd: True ileal amino acid and protein digestibility for selected human foods. FAO, Rome.
  4. FAO (2013): Dietary protein quality evaluation in human nutrition. Report of an FAO Expert Consultation. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 92, Rome. PDF

Values for individual foods and where they come from are listed under Data & sources. How proteinscore calculates is explained under Method.

Keep reading

All articles →
CookingRaw egg: only half of the protein gets digestedCombiningThe mix beats both: why combined proteins do moreVeganSoy milk 117, seitan 28: ranking the vegan classicsMeat alternativesPlant-based chicken in the lab: almost as much protein, far lower qualityProtein powderWhey 133, pea 73: how different protein powders really areVeganAlmost always the same amino acid is missing: plant protein checkedMeatSalami protein is as good as fresh beefGrainsToasted bread: a third of the lysine is lostProcessingRaw soy is only 37 % digested – what processing changesBasicsBiological value is outdated: what DIAAS does better